Well, well, well. How do you miss something like this in your cornerstone piece of legislation.
Hours after President Barack Obama signed historic health care legislation, a potential problem emerged. Administration officials are now scrambling to fix a gap in highly touted benefits for children.
Obama made better coverage for children a centerpiece of his health care remake, but it turns out the letter of the law provided a less-than-complete guarantee that kids with health problems would not be shut out of coverage.
Under the new law, insurance companies still would be able to refuse new coverage to children because of a pre-existing medical problem, said Karen Lightfoot, spokeswoman for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, one of the main congressional panels that wrote the bill Obama signed into law Tuesday.
However, if a child is accepted for coverage, or is already covered, the insurer cannot exclude payment for treating a particular illness, as sometimes happens now. For example, if a child has asthma, the insurance company cannot write a policy that excludes that condition from coverage. The new safeguard will be in place later this year.
Full protection for children would not come until 2014, said Kate Cyrul, a spokeswoman for the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, another panel that authored the legislation. That’s the same year when insurance companies could no longer deny coverage to any person on account of health problems.
Obama’s public statements have conveyed the impression that the new protections for kids were more sweeping and straightforward.
“This is a patient’s bill of rights on steroids,” the president said Friday at George Mason University in Virginia. “Starting this year, thousands of uninsured Americans with pre-existing conditions will be able to purchase health insurance, some for the very first time. Starting this year, insurance companies will be banned forever from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.” (Source: Gap in health care law’s protection for children- AP)
Read the rest.
Guess that happens when you don’t read the bill before ramming it through against the will of the American people. Right Congressman Kagen? Right Congressman Stupak? Right Congresswomen Pelosi?
Powered by ScribeFire.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Gap in Health Care Law’s Protection for Children (abcnews.go.com)
- That Talking Point/ High Point Didn’t Last Long (lakeshorelaments.com)
- Lie To Get It Passed, Then Regulate To Fill Gaps (cehwiedel.com)