COLLECTIVE bargaining rights for public employees are at the heart of the political battle raging in Wisconsin. But in economic and fiscal terms, abolishing contract negotiations between unions and management is not necessarily a panacea for state and local governments – or a nightmare for their workers. Consider Virginia, which bans collective bargaining and always has. Like pension systems in states friendlier to unions, the commonwealth’s public employee retirement system is underfunded by $17.6 billion. At the same time, teachers in Virginia have slightly higher average salaries than their unionized brethren in Wisconsin, and over the past decade, Old Dominion teacher pay grew a tad faster than teacher pay in the Badger State.
The point is that, whatever happens in Wisconsin, states and local governments across the country are faced with chronic fiscal problems rooted partly in unsustainable employee compensation systems. One way or another, they will have to be addressed, and there is only so much that can be achieved through raising revenue, since many of the most troubled states – California, New York and New Jersey – are already high-tax jurisdictions. Much of the issue is rooted in health-care costs, especially benefits for public-sector retirees.
The obvious solution is to rein in these costs by doing something like ask employees in the public sector to pay more towards these benefits. The union response:
this would be unfair to them, since they gave up wage increases in many cases to retain health benefits. It’s in the public interest, as well as a matter of fairness, to ensure that public employees receive reasonable compensation, so that well-qualified people want to become and remain teachers, police officers and bureaucrats.
As the Washington Post points out,
If the government-employee union movement wants to retain public sympathy and support, it must show definitively that it understands why so many people who are not Tea Party Republicans nevertheless worry about the cost of state and local pay and benefits. After all, Democratic officials – from Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo – have also targeted unsustainable personnel costs. No one should demonize public employees, who by and large are as hardworking as their private-sector counterparts. But efforts to rein in unaffordable public-sector compensation are not necessarily an attack on workers and their rights.
Says something when the Washington Post weighs in AGAINST the union argument.
- Goldberg: Government Unions Were Mistake (lakeshorelaments.com)
- And Now There Are 17 States Where Public-Sector Workers Are Protesting To Keep Their High Pay And Amazing Benefits… (businessinsider.com)
- Wisconsin: the New Name for Excitement (reason.com)