The entire battle of contemporary vs. traditional (Divine) when it comes to worship has been going on for quite some time. Some interesting thoughts from Pastor Peters on the topic.
Rich Mullins is a big name in the contemporary Christian music scene and I had not heard him say that contemporary Christian music is good entertainment but terrible worship. I concur and it gives me pause to think that one who has contributed so much to the standard literature of the CCM experience knows where is belongs and where it does not belong..
Leroy Huizenga suggests that among the reasons for the Lutheran (or other liturgical church’s) foray into contemporary worship and contemporary Christian music:
I suspect it involved a shift in the philosophy of religion (itself a subset of other cultural and intellectual currents) that came about in the 1960s and 1970s. Painting with a broad brush, before that time, religion concerned doctrine. After that shift, religion concerned experience. It’s easiest to see, I think, in evangelicalism, but the pattern holds for mainline Protestant and Catholic churches too. In any event, Christian worship became all too captive to culture and undergirded by a reflexive pragmatism.
No matter what side one is on, Pastor Peters makes a great point at the end.
The one thing that gets lost in all of this is that there is no relationship and there is no experience of Jesus apart from the means of grace. Larry Peters did not say it and neither did Luther or the Church before Him. The rock on which Jesus builds His Church is really Himself, the means of grace which impart Christ and His gifts to us, and the faith created by the Spirit that responds with “Amen.”
Read the rest: Pastoral Meanderings: Religion = doctrine or experience?.
- Lifestyle Worship (sjbrown58.wordpress.com)