An interesting perspective on Chief Justice Roberts in light of Thursday’s surprising SCOTUS ruling.
Roberts, who wanted to cement his reputation as a sober and judicious jurist, through his Hamlet-like deliberations ended up seeming incoherent, tentative, and unsure of himself. And if it’s true that rumors of Roberts reconsidering his vote swirled in Washington prior to the final outcome, and that such perceptions of hesitation prompted renewed venom and pressure — from not just the media, but from those such as Senator Leahy (who had voted to confirm Roberts) on the floors of Congress, and the president himself (who attacked the Court even earlier in his State of the Union address) — then the Court comes off as far more suspect after the opinion than before. Everything Roberts wished to prevent he ensured.
- The Right’s Top 5 Theories For John Roberts’ Betrayal (tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com)
- Did Roberts really switch his vote for political reasons? (hotair.com)
- Did the Supreme Court’s Deliberations on Healthcare Leak? (volokh.com)